KYC and KYB integration
Verification that holds up in production
We design, integrate and operate the identity and business checks behind onboarding for Indian NBFCs, digital lenders and fintechs — matched to your volume and your RBI obligations, and built to keep approving good applicants when a provider goes down.
What we build
KYB Verification Integration
Business verification integration for Indian lenders — GST, CIN, DIN and Udyam registry checks, entity resolution, and beneficial ownership trails.
KYC API Integration
We integrate KYC verification APIs into NBFC onboarding flows — vendor selection, fallback design, audit logging and go-live support for Indian lenders.
Managed Onboarding Operations
Ongoing operation of a live verification stack — monitoring, vendor failover, exception handling, cost control and change management on a retainer.
NBFC App Development
We build lending apps for Indian NBFCs — origination, underwriting integration, servicing, collections tooling and the regulatory surface a lender needs.
Re-KYC Remediation
Working through an overdue periodic updation backlog after the passed RBI deadline — segmentation, low-friction channels, and evidence of genuine effort.
Video KYC and V-CIP Integration
V-CIP integration built to the RBI-prescribed process — live agent sessions, geotagging, recording retention, concurrent audit and drop-off recovery.
Where onboarding usually breaks
The three problems below account for most of the verification work we are called in to fix. None of them show up on the day a flow launches.
A provider outage turns into a rejection
Most integrations treat a timeout exactly like a failed check, so an upstream outage quietly declines applicants who would have passed. Separating an infrastructure failure from a definitive negative result — and routing around it — is the single change that recovers the most approvals.
The audit asks for evidence nobody logged
A compliance review asks what was verified, against which source, on what date, and what the provider actually returned. If none of that was recorded at the moment of the check, reconstructing it costs weeks. We instrument the trail while building the integration rather than after the first query arrives.
One provider was chosen for everything
A provider that is excellent at PAN can be mediocre at bank-account validation and absent on Udyam. Choosing per check rather than per contract usually costs less and fails less often, and it is a decision far cheaper to make before the integration than during a migration.
Frequently asked questions
Are you a verification vendor?
No. We are an engineering firm. We issue no API keys and run no sandbox. We choose, integrate and operate the providers your onboarding calls, and the integration ends up in your repositories under your control.
What do we actually have at the end of an engagement?
Working code in your repositories, the failure paths deliberately exercised, an audit trail your compliance team can query, a runbook for each failure mode we designed around, and the reasoning behind every provider choice written down.
We already have a vendor contract. Is that a problem?
No. Where you have a commercial agreement in place we integrate against it. If a particular check would be better served elsewhere we will say so plainly, and you decide whether the switch is worth making.
Do you handle our customers' identity data?
Never. Verification calls flow between your systems and your providers. We build and operate the code that makes those calls and stay out of the data path — there is no upload capability anywhere on this site.
How long does an integration take?
A defined set of checks going live in an existing onboarding flow is usually a matter of weeks rather than months. The variable is almost always your release process rather than the integration work itself.
Tell us where your onboarding flow breaks
Describe the checks you need and what fails today. An engineer will read it and tell you what we would build — and whether you need us at all.
Talk to an engineer